What can explain Sz\u00fccs’s obsessed realism? Which is, of course, not realism either in the philosophical sense of the word; on the other hand the rhetoric of the Sz\u00fccsian depiction is after all based upon a realist method and the problematic of the grip on reality. Sz\u00fccs paints from photographs. He finds, collects and examines interesting pictures.<\/p>\n
He carries with him, in his memory, the preserved uneasiness and suddenly, out of the blue after some drawn studies, the pictures are transformed into paintings. The photograph is the mechanical mapping of the spectacle of reality. In the pictures of Sz\u00fccs, there is the act of selection that indicates the interesting elements of the spectacle of reality for him. As much as he intends to adhere to the mechanical image, the act of painting introduces personal elements. In spite of the endeavour for realism, the picture becomes opinion. Communicated.<\/p>\n
Thoughts kneaded into sentences, when yet they are unspeakable through the sounding of words and the brain’s capacity for sentence-formation. Only through pictures. Only in pictures.<\/p>\n
(Excerpt from: Iv\u00e1n Andr\u00e1s Boj\u00e1r, The Unhinged Realism of Attila Sz\u00fccs in: Sz\u00fccs Attila 1999-2000, De\u00e1k Erik\u00e1 Gal\u00e9ria, Budapest, 2000.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[],"class_list":["post-5094","kb_artist","type-kb_artist","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"article_image":5584,"article_image_bu_de":"","article_image_bu_en":"","datum_suche":"2013-07-10 10:39:03"},"yoast_head":"\n